Checked elsewhere

Checks published by other fact-checking organisations. We did not do these checks. Each one names who did, shows their rating in their own words, and links to their full article.

Their rating
Checked by Du-Check15 Mar 2024Polish
Istinom protiv laži

“Prema grupi znanstvenika sa Sveučilišta Cambridge, NAJMANJE 25% populacije sada pati od ekstremnih imunoloških odgovora na otrovne kemikalije pronađene u cjepivima protiv Covida.”

Du-Check rated this: Netočno, Manipulacija činjenicama

Du-Check says: Pseudo portal “Istinom protiv laži” objavio je članak u kojem tvrdi da mRNA COVID-19 cjepiva uzrokuju “sindrom stečene imunodeficijencije od cjepiva (VAIDS)”, stanje koje nije priznato kao medicinsko. Američki centar za…

Checked by FACTLY15 Mar 2024India
Social media posts

“Video depicting Rahul Gandhi insulting the Indian flag”

FACTLY rated this: MISLEADING

FACTLY says: In his speech, Rahul Gandhi asks the crowd for a flag-less stick to illustrate the alleged misuse of investigative agencies by the central government. However, this context is deliberately omitted, while sharing only th…

Checked by PolitiFact14 Mar 2024United StatesEducation
Social media posts

“A new Missouri bill “would put teachers on the sex offense registry if they ‘contribute to social transition’” of transgender students, including by using gender-affirming pronouns.”

PolitiFact rated this: Mostly True

PolitiFact says: The bill would make it a felony for a teacher to "support" a transgender student’s "social transition." The bill is unclear whether using gender-affirming pronouns for transgender students would constitute "support."